If f is continuous on a domain Ω and ∫Tf=0 for every triangle T⊂Ω, then f is holomorphic.
proof (Sketch):
Fix z0∈Ω and attempt to define a primitive F(z):=∫zz0f(ξ)dξ, integrating along any path connecting z0 to z. This will be well-defined since integrating along 2 different paths γ,μ will yield ∫γf+∫μf=∫γ⋅μf=0 by assumption since it bounds a closed region. Then just show F′=f.
If every integral along a triangle vanishes, implies holomorphic. Equivalently, f(z)dz is a closed differential form iff f is holomorphic.
Sometimes stated for rectangles with sides parallel to axes. The power of this theorem is that virtually no assumptions on f are made, e.g. f is not even assumed smooth or even differentiable.
If {fn}n∈N is a holomorphic sequence on a region Ω which uniformly converges to f on every compact subset K⊆Ω, then f is holomorphic, and f′n→f′ uniformly on every such compact subset K.
proof (?):
Commute limit with integral and apply Morera’s theorem.
This can be applied to series of the form ∑kfk(z).
Holomorphic implies analytic.
proof (?):
Taken from Gamelin: the proof is based on Morera’s theorem. Idea: break region into nested cubes:
Let R be a closed rectangle in D. We subdivide R into four equal subrectangles. Since the integral of f(z) around ∂R is the sum of the integrals of f(z) around the four subrectangles, there is at least one of the subrectangles, call it R1, for which |∫∂R1f(z)dz|≥14|∫∂Rf(z)dz| Now subdivide R1 into four equal subrectangles and repeat the procedure. This yields a nested sequence of rectangles {Rn} such that |∫∂Rnf(z)dz|≥14|∫∂Rn−1f(z)dz|≥⋯≥14n|∫∂Rf(z)dz|. Since the Rn ’s are decreasing and have diameters tending to 0 , the Rn ’s converge to some point z0∈D. Since f(z) is differentiable at z0, we have an estimate of the form |f(z)−f(z0)z−z0−f′(z0)|≤εn,z∈Rn, where εn→0 as n→∞. Let L be the length of ∂R. Then the length of ∂Rn is L/2n. For z belonging to Rn we have the estimate |f(z)−f(z0)−f′(z0)(z−z0)|≤εn|z−z0|≤2εnL/2n. From the ML-estimate and Cauchy’s theorem, we obtain |∫∂Rnf(z)dz|=|∫∂Rn[f(z)−f(z0)−f′(z0)(z−z0)]dz|≤(2εnL/2n)⋅(L/2n)=2L2εn/4n Hence |∫∂Rf(z)dz|≤4n|∫∂Rnf(z)dz|≤2L2εn Since εn→0 as n→∞, we must have ∫∂Rf(z)dz=0. By Morera’s theorem, f(z) is analytic.
Exercises
For Ω⊆C, show that A(C):={f:Ω→C | f is holomorphic, bounded} is a Banach space.
Hint: Apply Morera’s Theorem and Cauchy’s Theorem